<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Seth Godin’s Social Media Experiment</title> <atom:link href="http://marketingwizdom.com/archives/2264/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://marketingwizdom.com/archives/2264</link> <description>Mentoring aspiring market leaders in world-class low-risk/high-return marketing strategies</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Robert Clay</title><link>http://marketingwizdom.com/archives/2264/comment-page-1#comment-579</link> <dc:creator>Robert Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:41:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://marketingwizdom.com/?p=2264#comment-579</guid> <description>You make some very good points Olivier. I agree. I personally approach it as outlined here: http://marketingwizdom.com/twitter</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some very good points Olivier. I agree. I personally approach it as outlined here: <a
href="http://marketingwizdom.com/twitter" rel="nofollow">http://marketingwizdom.com/twitter</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Olivier Blais</title><link>http://marketingwizdom.com/archives/2264/comment-page-1#comment-574</link> <dc:creator>Olivier Blais</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:12:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://marketingwizdom.com/?p=2264#comment-574</guid> <description>I think that the best way to act is to avoid following yourself people just to follow them. It is logical to follow accounts that interest you. I like to look at the following/ followers ration because it shows people who only follow in order to be followed. At that point, I agree that they could spend more time interacting with their followers. In other words, better have a rich conversation with few than nothing with 10,000 people.Great job!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the best way to act is to avoid following yourself people just to follow them. It is logical to follow accounts that interest you. I like to look at the following/ followers ration because it shows people who only follow in order to be followed. At that point, I agree that they could spend more time interacting with their followers. In other words, better have a rich conversation with few than nothing with 10,000 people.</p><p>Great job!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Clay</title><link>http://marketingwizdom.com/archives/2264/comment-page-1#comment-425</link> <dc:creator>Robert Clay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://marketingwizdom.com/?p=2264#comment-425</guid> <description>It&#039;s pretty easy to focus in on those who are advocates among your followers. There are numerous tools available to check who interacts with you; who retweets your messages etc. Just set up twitter lists for people in each of these categories then focus your interactions mainly on these self-selecting followers and rebuild your network around them. You can also have a big clean out and unfollow everyone who is not on one of those quality lists, there are numerous tools that allow you to do so.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty easy to focus in on those who are advocates among your followers. There are numerous tools available to check who interacts with you; who retweets your messages etc. Just set up twitter lists for people in each of these categories then focus your interactions mainly on these self-selecting followers and rebuild your network around them. You can also have a big clean out and unfollow everyone who is not on one of those quality lists, there are numerous tools that allow you to do so.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scott Couchenour</title><link>http://marketingwizdom.com/archives/2264/comment-page-1#comment-418</link> <dc:creator>Scott Couchenour</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://marketingwizdom.com/?p=2264#comment-418</guid> <description>So what do you tell the person reading your post who has generated a lot of likely faux followers  to do now to mograte to that quality of followership? What do they do now?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what do you tell the person reading your post who has generated a lot of likely faux followers  to do now to mograte to that quality of followership? What do they do now?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul Mackenzie Ross</title><link>http://marketingwizdom.com/archives/2264/comment-page-1#comment-411</link> <dc:creator>Paul Mackenzie Ross</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:48:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://marketingwizdom.com/?p=2264#comment-411</guid> <description>You don&#039;t have to be Seth Godin or to even read his words to know that quality is better than quantity any day. That really is schoolboy stuff.As for the sentiment &quot;just do more viral&quot; that&#039;s really easier said than done. I know the focus is narrowed to twitter here, but who constantly and regularly tweets viral content? Isn&#039;t viral supposed to be viral in its own context rather than viral because of the status and reputation of the source?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to be Seth Godin or to even read his words to know that quality is better than quantity any day. That really is schoolboy stuff.</p><p>As for the sentiment &#8220;just do more viral&#8221; that&#8217;s really easier said than done. I know the focus is narrowed to twitter here, but who constantly and regularly tweets viral content? Isn&#8217;t viral supposed to be viral in its own context rather than viral because of the status and reputation of the source?<br
/> <span
class="cluv">Paul Mackenzie Ross´s last [type] ..<a
class="e41b7685e1 411" href="http://paulmackenzieross.com/iphone-4/">iPhone 4</a></span></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stating the Obvious &#124; paulmackenzieross.com</title><link>http://marketingwizdom.com/archives/2264/comment-page-1#comment-410</link> <dc:creator>Stating the Obvious &#124; paulmackenzieross.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:31:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://marketingwizdom.com/?p=2264#comment-410</guid> <description>[...] as the modern day guru [Other gurus may be available] Godin recently stated, as pointed out in Seth Godin&#8217;s Social Media Experiment post over at Robert Clay&#8217;s Marketing Wizdom blog, that (my distaillation of the points here), [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as the modern day guru [Other gurus may be available] Godin recently stated, as pointed out in Seth Godin&#8217;s Social Media Experiment post over at Robert Clay&#8217;s Marketing Wizdom blog, that (my distaillation of the points here), [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 13/32 queries in 0.047 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: marketingwizdom.com @ 2012-02-04 07:28:07 -->
