How to be credible when you connect on LinkedIn

Do you automatically accept every connection request you receive on LinkedIn? I don’t, writes Robert Clay of Marketing Wizdom, and I hope you don’t either. Here’s why.

LinkedIn is a massive global phenomenon these days. As I write this it has 120 million users and is the biggest professional network in the world. It’s said that if you’re not on LinkedIn you may as well not exist. And there’s plenty of truth in that. It is also an incredibly valuable resource. But its value comes from the quality of the connections you establish, and that means NOT accepting every connection request that comes your way.

Although I already have a large network on LinkedIn (14 million people through 3 levels) it has been built one link at a time, being very selective about who I connect with. If I or someone else has specifically directed you to this post when you’ve tried to connect with me or them, it could be that something about your approach or your profile is acting as a barrier to my or their connecting with you.

If you want to connect with me (or anyone else) and you haven’t already met face to face, then I suggest you follow the guidelines set out below. And when other people want to connect with you I suggest you adopt a similar approach for your own due diligence before blindly accepting connection requests.

Personalise your connection request

Let’s start with your connection request. When you try to connect with me (or anyone else for that matter) on LinkedIn I recommend that you ALWAYS personalise your connection request, e.g. “It was great to meet you at time/place/event. I saw your profile here on LinkedIn and if you’re happy with my profile after you’ve checked it out, it would be great to connect with you here.” Obviously the wording you use will vary depending on the situation.

If you just use the standard bland wording i.e. “I’d like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn” or “Since you are a person I trust I wanted to invite you to join my network on LinkedIn.” (or other regional variations), and you’re not already well known to me, or we have never interacted, you’re in danger of coming across as yet another person who probably wants my email address to spam me with unwanted messages, or perhaps someone who wants to do the same to my contacts. Most people have little or no tolerance for uninvited emails these days, and as I get 10-20 such requests every day, I’m really not likely to accept.

If you personalise your invite and explain WHERE you came across me or where and when we met, or WHY you want to connect with me, it will likely get my attention because you’re demonstrating that you’re thinking about each connection individually, and not just connecting by rote. In that case I am MUCH more likely to connect with you.

If you send a connection request on the pretext of being a friend, or claim to have worked with me at a company or organisation that I’ve never had any dealings with, or have never heard of, or claim that you went to a school or university with me that I never attended (I get several of those every day too), then you’re insulting my intelligence and I may well decide that you’re dodgy for making such easily disproved claims before the relationship is even underway. The connection needs to be real.

I’m more relaxed about this if it’s the only way you can connect with me, as long as you give a good reason for connecting and I also buy into that reason. It comes right back to personalising your connection request.

But if you fail to personalise your connection request AND you purport to be a friend or former colleague when that clearly isn’t the case I am extremely unlikely to connect with you. Would you really want to connect with people for no good reason and on the basis of a completely fabricated connection? Smells like a potential spammer, whether that is the reality or not.

Giving your prospective contacts a credible reason for connecting is only the first part of the equation. Before deciding whether to connect with you I will normally look for several more things.

Do you have a profile photo?

I want to know who I’m dealing with. If I don’t see a profile photo it may be because you’re not who or what you claim to be. That arouses my suspicions and makes it less likely that I will connect with you. If you’re new to LinkedIn and haven’t got around to adding a photo yet, then may I suggest you do so at the earliest opportunity. It only takes a few seconds.

Is your profile complete?

LinkedIn is a wonderful tool for getting a sense of who you’re dealing with. It’s useful to know what you do, where you’re based, what you did in the past, what you’ve accomplished, the ways in which you’re qualified and how you can add value to any connection. A decent LinkedIn profile tells you all of this, and more, at a glance. If your profile tells me little or nothing I might think that you’re just out to spam me and my contacts which makes it very unlikely that I would want to connect with you.

Again if you’re new to LinkedIn and haven’t got around to adding any detail to your profile, I suggest you get onto that task as soon as you can because an empty profile raises more questions than it answers and does nothing to generate any confidence in you or what you do.

Have you earned credible recommendations?

LinkedIn allows your contacts to recommend you. It’s good to know that recommendations cannot be edited by their recipients, and furthermore every recommendation can be traced back to its source with a single click, so that you can tell it’s genuine. Before connecting with you I will always look for credible recommendations on your profile to indicate whether you’re any good at what you do.

If you have a few hundred connections and no recommendations it gives the impression that you’re really NOT that good at what you do … which will again raise serious questions about whether I really want to connect with you. How can someone have several hundred connections but NO recommendations if they’re any good at what they do? Something doesn’t stack up.

And if you DO have recommendations, I want to make sure that they are not just ‘recommendations by rote.’ What I mean by that is that some people blast everyone they know with requests for a recommendation, whether they’ve earned it or not, and some contacts feel obliged to respond. I regularly receive such requests.

If you ask me to recommend you when I have no experience of your product, service or expertise, I will ask you how you can possibly expect me to recommend you. To do so would not only be inauthentic, but it also, for me, goes against the whole ethos of LinkedIn, which is about building high quality connections or relationships.

When you see bland recommendation after bland recommendation on someone’s profile along the lines of “He or she is reliable, and/or knows their stuff”, or “He or she is a great networker” or “he or she is a good guy/girl/person” those recommendations clearly have no substance, and you can be pretty sure that they’re examples of people who have responded to a recommendation request just to be nice, or out of a misplaced sense of obligation, or to curry favour … and not because the person requesting it has earned it. So I look for genuine recommendations.

Sometimes I’m contacted by people I’ve never heard of, but when I read their recommendations it is obvious that they are VERY good at what they do, and their recommendations are genuine. In those cases it is always a delight and great honour to connect with them and I really don’t have to think too hard about it. I WANT to associate with people like that. They make a very valuable addition to any network.

If you’re new to LinkedIn and you don’t yet have any recommendations, then by all means ask people from whom you have genuinely EARNED a recommendation to recommend you. But DON’T blast everyone you’re connected to with a recommendation request unless they have real life experience of what you do. Anything else is meaningless. People are not stupid and will see right through hollow recommendations which will in turn only devalue everything else you do. A good network is not about numbers but about quality, sincerity and trust!

The best recommendations, of course, are always the ones that are unsolicited. And it’s usually possible to tell which ones they are.

Are our mutual connections credible?

I also look at how you’re already connected to me. If you’re already connected to a number of people I know well, trust, or hold in high regard I’m much more likely to accept your connection request than if there is no connection at all, or your only connection is via people I hardly know, if at all, or if I consider them to be lacking credibility in some way.

And if someone has their blog embedded in their LinkedIn profile it’s usually a good sign. You can get an even better feel for what they’re about.

Conclusion

So in conclusion, if you want to connect with me (or anyone else) on LinkedIn, make sure you personalise your connection request by giving a credible reason. Don’t fabricate the connection. Make sure you have a decent photo on your profile and that your profile is complete. Demonstrate your competence with genuine recommendations that you’ve EARNED … and consider who you’re already connected to. The more credible they are, the more credible you will be.

Do those things, show that you’re genuine and that you add value, and I’ll likely be delighted to connect with you. Ignore those things and I’ll likely have plenty of good reasons to ignore you.

Now that you’ve read my views, I’d be interested to hear yours. If you have anything to add to this post or would like to elaborate further on any of the points I’ve raised here, please comment below. I welcome anything you can contribute to the discussion.

This post is brought to you by Robert Clay

If you’ve enjoyed this post and want to be notified when other new articles come up, just click here. To get your free copy of Robert Clay's well regarded book “Learn how to grow your business … in just two hours: An introduction to low risk/high-return marketing strategies that will help you transform your business”, click here. If you would like to share any of your personal experiences, observations or the results you’ve achieved using these or similar tips, please leave your comments and/or thoughts below. We always love to hear from you:

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.pricingrevolution.com Leigh Caldwell

    Agree with all of this – I would just add the caveat that occasionally LinkedIn does not have a suitable category for describing my connection with someone.

    Although there is an “Other” category, this requires that you know the person’s email address, which in a world coming to be more twitter-dominated I don’t always have.

    So I will sometimes use “Have done business with” at Inon, or “Friend”, even when neither is strictly true.

    I do always customise the invite though, so hopefully this helps. I also don’t tend to use it for connecting with people I’d LIKE to know, as opposed to those I DO know. That might be interesting for the future though.

    There are some contexts for requesting a connection which do not ask the “How do you know me?” question. I’m not sure whether in these cases LinkedIn substitutes one of the options by default, or just leaves it blank.

  • http://marketingwizdom.com Robert Clay

    Thanks for adding your thoughts Leigh. Yes I agree with your point about other. Like you, when connecting with people I will use “Have done business with” in my case Marketing Wizdom … but the difference is that I ALWAYS personalise the connection request. Hence I am tolerant of people doing the same to me if the request has been personalised, but not so much if it is a completely impersonal request.

    Like you, I tend to initiate connections with people I already know. But I also sometimes do so with people I’d like to know … but again they always receive a personalised connection request, where I usually invite them to check out my profile before connecting so that they can be comfortable that I am genuine and not another spammer. It works well for me.

  • russell archer

    An excellent article; everyone should read and abide by these principles.

  • http://marketingwizdom.com Robert Clay

    Thank you Russell, I really appreciate that.

  • Heather Townsend

    Hello Robert, great article – I just wish that more people would read it. I get a lot less random requests to connect on LinkedIn than you, but I tire of the ‘I’d like to add you to my professional network’.

    I tend to always ask this person what has prompted them to connect. If there is a valid reason, such as they have read my book ‘The FT guide to business networking’, then I will almost definitely connect. If they just want to add me because I’m another entry in their address book, I normally politely decline.

  • http://marketingwizdom.com Robert Clay

    Hi Heather, great to hear from you especially as you are such a renowned authority on LinkedIn. Needless to say I thoroughly agree with your approach ;-)

  • http://blog.realpoint.co.uk/feed/ Ian ODonnell

    A great set of guidance on connecting on LinkedIn and certainly the approach I tend to follow when it comes to deciding whether to accept a connection. One thing that amazes me with the “mass connectors” and standard message users are those who don’t even have the courtesy to reply when I ask why they are looking to connect. Very strange.

    My one big frustration is the options on why I’m choosing to connect, I wish there was one for “met networking” at the moment the only option for that is “friend” which I find inappropriate.

  • http://marketingwizdom.com Robert Clay

    Thank you for your validation of my approach Ian. I might have known that you’d be approaching it the right way. And you’re absolutely right, when challenged to come up with a reason for connecting, so many people just disappear, never to be heard from again. Shows, I suppose, that they were only out to inflate their connection numbers without ever considering who they were connecting to or why. Your idea for a “met networking” or “met face to face” option is a good one. Perhaps you should suggest it to LinkedIn.

  • http://www.ireneimmink.nl Irene

    Hi Robert,

    I really like to read your piece. It helped me in reflecting how I use LinkedIn in the past as an employee in the nonprofit sector and how I should use it from now on as aspirant business owner and entrepreneur. I deal with connection requests the same way as you describe. I only connect with people I really have seen in reality. i.e. ‘face to face’. Your thought on how to get recommendations and what kind of recommendations are very clear and fine. I keep this in mind to improve my profile.

    Best wishes, Irene

  • http://marketingwizdom.com Robert Clay

    Hi Irene, thanks for talking the trouble to leave a comment. I know a number of people who only connect with people they’ve met face to face. I do that, but extend it to people who are also in some way credible to me, either because of their reputation or obvious accomplishments. I am glad the post gave you additional clarity on recommendations. Thanks again Irene.

  • http://www.bizspace.co.uk Ann-Marie

    Hi Robert,

    I read your piece with interest as I often get requests from people I don’t know, especially outside the UK, and I can’t understand what prompted them to get in touch. I almost always decline I may add.

    I must admit in the early days of me using Linkedin I did try and connect with people I was interested in talking to without personalising the request but not now – I have learnt you’ll be pleased to know!

    I will bear in mind your comments about recommendations and try to raise my profile by requesting only ‘real’ ones.

    Many thanks
    Ann-Marie

  • http://marketingwizdom.com Robert Clay

    Hi Ann-Marie, seems like you’ve come a long way in your use of LinkedIn, and that you’re very much on the right track. Always good to know!

  • http://wwww.healinghandstherapies.org Sarah Wiltshire

    Hi Robert

    Just read your article – saw the link on Twitter. As someone new to LinkedIn have been thinking about how to approach forming connections – so your experience and thoughts have been very useful in helping me to decide who is and isn’t ‘appropriate’. Thank you. Sarah.

  • http://marketingwizdom.com Robert Clay

    Thank you for your comments, Sarah, and my apologies for taking so long to respond. I have been away most of the year so far and just catching up with my backlog now. I’m glad my article helped. I wrote it because I am so often approached by people I don’t know, and they give no reasons. In fact I’ve just checked and there are currently 195 new LinkedIn connection requests sitting in my inbox. I will now be going through them all applying the criteria mentioned in my article.

  • Daviod Cooper

    Robert,
    Very interesting article – great to be able to benchmark your own Linkedin profile off such an analysis.

  • Daviod Cooper

    Robert,
    Very interesting article – great to be able to benchmark your own Linkedin profile off such an analysis.

  • Abdul hafezi

    Much of what you say I agree and follow. However I no longer request connections except people I know. I have never ever got work through any of the contacts

  • Russ Knight

    I like the guidance about how to ask for connections, but your approach is one side of the ongoing debate about linkedIn – you say be very careful about who you accept. The other side of the coin says that student in China (that you probably can’t help and can’t directly help you) could be the link to that CEO you really want to meet.

    Which approach is right? Depends on the person.

    Good post. Good content. Good thinking.

  • http://marketingwizdom.com/ Robert Clay

    I can see both sides of the debate, and both are valid in different ways. Since I have a large network anyway, I choose to focus on quality of individual connections. A decent number of quality connections can create a massive network giving you access to almost anyone you DO need to connect with, without suffering the spam or time consuming irrelevance that comes from connecting indiscriminately.

    As you say, it depends on the person.

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts, they add to the debate.